Friday, December 31, 2010

Chavez at it once again...


Venezuela has headed quicker in a direction that will result in utter ruin for generations by allowing Hugu Chávez to rule by decree – without consultation of the new Congress – until mid-2012. This was rushed through because in a few weeks congressmen who were elected recently, were about to be sworn in providing the opposition with more votes against Chavez. Giving any leader this sort of power is outrageous and especially scary when given to a man who has a sinister agenda like Chavez does. This means that any policy that Chavez dreams up can become law, no matter the opposition from others. Chavez has already seen the economy have inflation of 27 per cent currently the highest in Latin America.

He taunted the incoming opposition congressmen in a television address.."You won't be able to make a single law, little Yankees," he said, deploying one of his favourite insults, which depicts his opponents as American stooges.

"We're going to see how you make laws now."

The 18-month period means the opposition will be blocked from any significant role in Venezuelan politics until just months before the 2012 presidential election.


He has realised that even with 2 years to go until the next presidential elections he does not have complete control of the country. He has also used these powers to establish 10 military districts — many of them in three western states bordering Colombia, two of which are led by opposition governors. Chavez did not elaborate on how the districts will be administered, but they could be under the equivalent of martial law.

In a single week, he has used an outgoing National Assembly packed with loyalists to gain new abilities to crack down on critics — over the air, on the Internet, in universities and from independent organizations that get foreign funding. He also has obtained broad powers to bypass Venezuela's legislature and enact laws by decree for the next year and a half.

Chavez is likely to use the new powers to try to strengthen his political footing as he prepares for the next presidential election in less than two years.


Furthermore, he is cracking down hard on any opposition to his rule - banning foreign donations going to NGOs, penalises organisations or political parties that invite foreigners to the country who publicly give "opinions that offend institutions of the state, its high officials" or that are contrary to Venezuela's sovereignty. Groups can be fined for such statements, and political parties can be barred from elections for five to eight years. He also passed a law that would allow for the suspension of any lawmakers who defect from a party during their term. That aims to counter defections in the current legislature, where about a dozen lawmakers have broken with Chavez.

He is also busting up student protests with far more gusto than anything seen by police in London lately. This is in response to moves by Chavez to eliminate universities independence and instead to enforce that a university must promote Chavez's socialist ideology. As one can imagine, students are pissed about it. He was equally as brutal with the media pushing RCTV, a critical television network, off the airwaves and revoked the licenses of 34 radio stations across the country. Mr. Chávez has also forced broadcasters to transmit live his speeches and televised appearances, which last hours.

In essence he is hellbent on speeding up the reforms that I have been blogging about for years

I fear for the good people of Venezuela who are part of this mad experiment.

Update

Kiwiblog earlier has shown concern for the internet interference from Chavez and has many remarkably stupid commets that follow. I guess some people are ignoring history.

But wait, comedy gold follows at the Labour/Union funded Standard... they largely back the measures of Chavez and of course blame the US. How quaint.

Labels: , ,

6 Comments:

Blogger Finnegan Deuce said...

"Venezuela has headed quicker in a direction that will result in utter ruin for generations by allowing Hugu Chávez to rule by decree – without consultation of the new Congress – until mid-2012. This was rushed through because in a few weeks congressmen who were elected recently, were about to be sworn in providing the opposition with more votes against Chavez. Giving any leader this sort of power is outrageous"

If it's so outrageous, why haven't you commented on the CERRA (at least, not that I can find browsing the Sept/Oct archives and searching using a few relevant terms) that allows Gerry Brownlee to rule by decree?

7:20 PM  
Blogger Heine said...

Ah yes, I remember you. You commented on a post I made about idiot bludger Omar Hamed - who you tried to defend. How did that go?

I think it is a very long bow you're drawing equating a state where Chavez has complete control of the courts and has armed his militia with hundreds of millions of dollars worth of weapons - and Gerry Brownlee. You forget, NZ still has checks and balances while Venezuela is destined to become a violent lawless poverty stricken backwater once Chavez is finished with it.

4:50 AM  
Blogger Finnegan Deuce said...

If you are referring to this exchange, I think it went fairly well, since I was right and you were wrong.

NZ still has checks and balances

No, the CERRA abolished checks and balances.

I think it is a very long bow you're drawing equating a state where Chavez has complete control of the courts and has armed his militia with hundreds of millions of dollars worth of weapons - and Gerry Brownlee.

Is your problem with the concept of rule by decree, or with Hugo Chavez in particular? Your blog post suggests the former, but now you appear to be arguing the latter. Does granting the power to legislate by decree become more or less outrageous depending on who the power is granted to? I would argue that it is outrageous in principle, but you apparently don't agree. Given that, could you please tell me, for each of the following names, whether it would be a good idea or a bad idea to grant the person in question the authority to legalise murder and rape by the police:

1. Tony Blair
2. Sue Bradford
3. Gerry Brownlee
4. David Cameron
5. Fidel Castro
6. Peter Cresswell
7. Milton Friedman
8. Phil Goff
9. Rodney Hide
10. John Key
11. Margaret Thatcher

2:22 PM  
Blogger Heine said...

Er no you didn't. You trolled a year and a half late to defend a rather wretched person and tried to paint freedom of association as a bad thing. This pretty much sums up your mentality - you support the brutal regime of Chavez because his ideals fit into your ideology.

Cute list too. None of them should be granted any decree at all. I wasn't saying that Browlee was any better than Chavez.

You'll have to remind me when the NZ Govt poured billions into arming its police who swear loyalty to John Key. When was the last time Key closed down newspapers and arrested and imprisoned media for speaking up against him. I don't seem to remember that?

Mind you, you are saying that NZ is similar to Venezuela which is beyond stupid, so I don't expect a straight up answer from you - probably more snivelling about how mean I am to Chavez.

10:28 PM  
Blogger Finnegan Deuce said...

I figured ACT supporters would have a little trouble reading, but this is getting ridiculous.

tried to paint freedom of association as a bad thing

AUSA is a voluntary association. Shouldn't it be able to support whatever political causes it pleases? Not only do members have the option of voting in a different leadership (as they would under a CSM regime), but they can simply leave the organisation. Criticising it for "behav[ing] like a compulsory union" makes no sense, because it behaves in the way that its members (who are, I feel I must again stress, only members voluntarily) want it to behave. AUSA has no obligation to pursue policies that you think are "commonsense". Rather, it pursues policies that its members (who are members of their own volition) want it to pursue. Understand?

you support the brutal regime of Chavez because his ideals fit into your ideology.

Now you are just making things up. Nothing in this clause is true.

I wasn't saying that Browlee was any better than Chavez.

Is rule by decree outrageous in principle or outrageous when people who you don't like can do it? All I did was ask why you did not blog about the CERRA. Whether New Zealand is anything like Venezuela is irrelevant to the question of whether it is a good idea to allow politicians from either country to rule by decree.

You'll have to remind me when the NZ Govt poured billions into arming its police who swear loyalty to John Key. When was the last time Key closed down newspapers and arrested and imprisoned media for speaking up against him.

I have made no comparisons of New Zealand and Venezuela in a general sense. I asked why you didn't consider granting Gerry Brownlee the power to rule by decree outrageous enough to write a blog post about it. I do not think that the likelihood of the power being abused makes any difference as to whether it is a good idea or not. The goodwill of politicians is the last thing anybody ought to be expected to rely upon.

you are saying that NZ is similar to Venezuela

Making stuff up again...

snivelling about how mean I am to Chavez.

and again. Do you just think of something you don't like and assume that whoever you are arguing with said it?

9:33 AM  
Blogger Heine said...

You think I want to waste my time talking to somebody who thinks it's clever to compare the Chavez regime in a aspiring 3rd world nation and New Zealand?

I have no problem with AUSA. They are voluntary. I never complained about them. Sure it isn't a great model of voluntary unionism, but if it keeps millions out of the hands of your mates - it's a bloody good thing.

I didn't blog about the CERRA as it was well covered on the other blogs. I would merely be repeating what Whale Oil or Kiwiblog would say about it.

You were stupidly comparing the two when anybody can see that this law, which is being implemented in Venezuela is already being exploited. When was it exploited in NZ? You don't have any proof - and yet I have been proved very right by the actual deeds and acts committed by Chavez.

9:57 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home