The OUSA President has
blogged his opinions on Voluntary Student union Membership (VSM) this week. As a (very) long time pro freedom activist I felt I should rebut some of his remarks.
Firstly I’d like to state that my opinion around the VSM (voluntary student membership) issue is non-biased. Now as you all gasp in disbelief over the student’s presidents claim that his opinion around a parliamentary private member’s bill that looks to make the revenue stream of OUSA disappear and potentially destroy his association is ‘non-biased’ let me explain why. I am a Scarfie. I live on Hyde Street in a freezing cold flat and drink southern gold like it is going out of fashion.
An OUSA President, one that is at the helm of an organisation that is addicted to spending the $2million plus per annum it collects from students cannot possibly be non biased. It’s impossible. It’s no point pretending to be an average student with no possible ulterior motive – the facts speak for themselves – OUSA is a compulsory union, the same type of union that the Council of Trade Unions was before they became voluntary.
Right away Logan admits OUSA isn’t doing its job properly. He admits the revenue stream “may disappear”... that doesn’t sound like a bloke that values the organisation that he is in charge of does it?
I have been in this job for a little over two months now; can you comprehend how fabulous it would look on my C.V to be ‘the’ president, effectively the CEO of a multi-million dollar organisation and the man who lead it through a complete restructure? It would be tackling an issue which would be, dare I say it, the most challenging of any president in OUSA’s 123 year existence, don’t worry though I would do a bloody fine job of it. Now to slap that alongside my commerce degree would look pretty nifty.
So far he has done an awful job of it. He was the public face of “selling” Radio 1. He was hated by many students for even suggesting it – despite it being the right idea. It failed anyway, and he needs to find another way to restructure OUSA. Surely he must attempt to cut subsidies to Radio 1? He also ripped up student protester posters – hardly the work of a man who represents “all students” is it? His (most likely drunken) rant at Sir Roger Douglas’s Facebook page is more proof he isn’t representative to his members. His conduct on the protest against the PM (more proof he doesn’t represent his members) was appalling as well.
He has to admit that he doesn’t represent the views of the majority of students. More students voted for National, ACT and United than they did for the Greens and Labour at the last election. ACT and National MPs and activists have continuously supported a VSM policy since the 90’s. At NO stage have they said they would not pursue this policy – however it is a matter of priorities. The conduct of student unions up and down NZ have made this law a greater priority for this government and behaviour from presidents like Logan, against the student body has meant priorities have changed.
So why I am opposed to VSM? Is it that I actually want the best for the students? Well yes it is. I am of the firm belief that Scarfie life is so stimulating because of our students associations’ existence. Sure you are forced to pay a compulsory fee, but for that you get services and events that are actually relevant to you and actually materialize, it’s like compulsory fun.
“Compulsory fun”? Surely a joke? If he wanted the best for his members, why would he spit at the political beliefs of the students who voted for a pro VSM party at the general election? How can Logan say that students will no longer be “Scarfies” if they are no longer forced to join a union?
How many students are actually involved in normal student union activities? Elections barely get 10% of support. Student Union meetings have been constantly under quorum and have been changed to online meetings to save face. OUSA has a long history of failed quorums – in the past they used to count anybody sitting close to the meeting as participants. Logan has fallen into the trap that so many have fallen into – that OUSA is responsible for all of the fun on campus and that students are unable to organise themselves.
You get representation which acts to protect your interests without any effort needed on your part. You get the student support centre, food-bank, advocacy, free legal advice, queer support, and always a friend to talk to, a squash club, a yacht club, a rowing club, clubs and societies building, monetary grants, Unipol, events such as paint parties, capping show, international food night and the list goes on and on. When students come to University it is quite often their first time away from home and its awesome that this support is here for us all during our studies.
The representation you receive is extremely limited. It is limited to those who share the political views of the association. Let’s put aside the obvious political bias for a moment. Nobody in NZ can advocate for 20,000 people no matter the beliefs they have. OUSA cannot represent the beliefs of all their members, it’s impossible.
If you are lucky enough to have access to the OUSA budget, you will see the advocacy, food bank, legal advice and support centre occupies a miniscule part of the OUSA budget. Logan has also stated that in order to get a degree, all students have to fund a squash club, rowing and yachting clubs and a whole variety of interests that students may choose to engage in during their studies. Why is it good enough for non students to do this in the real world and yet not for students? Do all students appreciate that they are funding political and sporting activities and must do in order to get a degree?
So let me discuss with you the real implication of this bill. Should VSM pass we would quite simply not be able to provide all the great services we currently deliver all for students.
Nonsense.
However, that’s not to say they would all go. It’s just that the University would pick up the tab for them. Now you’re kidding yourself if you think your mate the University would just eat into its own cash reserves in order to provide such services for you. The levy that you pay now would either, stay the same, or more lightly increase to compensate for additional overheads (and the fact that University’s quite like money).
OUSA has cash reserves and assets. Logan has not mentioned this at all. He has not said how much OUSA would need to break even. However this is still quite telling that Logan is admitting that revenue will fall. After all, all students will need to do at enrolment is to tick a box. If he is stating that OUSA can’t even get students to tick a box then he knows that students do NOT value their membership.
So it’s the University providing the services for you and not students and of course the University probably will not want to fund all services, for example student media (Critic, Radio One) and most probably any sort of event that involves drinking as it has become apparent that the incoming vice-chancellor is dead against the social climate Otago is famous for.
Student media like Radio 1? The same station that is bleeding cash profusely and needs to be sold or restructured desperately?
Is Logan saying that drinking events will be cancelled at University because of VSM? Can you see how stupid that sounds. It’s a blatant lie. Logan knows this. He lives on Hyde Street... I lived on Hyde Street. Every year the residents on this street holds a massive drinking event. It’s NOT controlled by the student union. For Logan to state this is such a shame for a student who describes himself as an average student.
What OUSA would look like under VSM is a structure that provides core functions. For example we would maintain our student support, and hopefully the student media, although my guess is that cost cutting measures would probably make it a bit shit, unless for example Critic and Radio One could become profitable or near enough break-even.
No Logan. It would provide what the MEMBERS want. Your OUSA survey stated that Radio 1 was their least valued service on campus. Listen to your members!
We would charge a zero dollar levy and at the start of every semester we would have to painstakingly chase around after students making sure all of them (or near enough) are signed up as members as the proposed VSM legislation would mean that Universities could not even inform students of the associations’ existence, sound suspicious?
Lies, lies and more lies. Who said OUSA would charge a zero levy? Does Logan have a say in how the 2012/13 and future years budgets will be set? Who said they would chase it up? Who said the University would not inform OUSA of members?
By having all students signed up it then means that we can go to the University and say “Hello, we represent all students and therefore we would like to sit in on all of your councils and committee’s” we would do this so students are still represented within the University and can advocate and fight for them.
You can’t do that today! OUSA doesn’t represent all students today and is seen as weak by the University. The powers that be know that OUSA cannot get the support for more than 10% of its members.
Currently all tertiary students have a united voice in this country by means of the NZUSA (New Zealand Union of Students Associations’) which is a great thing to have for times like this when Politian’s try screwing students over. There are 14 University and Polytechnic student’s associations that belong too, and wholly fund NZUSA. It is my belief that should VSM come in, NZUSA will be student’s associations first cost cutting measure and once a few pull out there will be a domino effect as the remaining members could not fund NZUSA on their own. It would be a real shame considering what NZUSA has done for students historically over its 80 year existence.
Logan is out of the loop regarding NZUSA membership. Most of NZ student unions are already pulling out or considering pulling out of NZUSA. NZUSA costs OUSA over $100k p/a. It is a drain on OUSA to be paying for 3 full time students activists in their Lampton Quay office, especially as the NZUSA do very little for Otago students.
The polytech next door to Otago Uni has pulled out and many are following.
But the sting in the tail... membership to NZUSA? It’s VOLUNTARY!
NZUSA is the reason students today have interest free student loans and student allowances which are vital to student life. How quickly will they disappear if the students do not have a united voice to fight for them? We know that the National Party hate the massive financial burden that the student loans and allowances impose. Maybe this is the reason for the government wanting students’ associations’ gone? You may say that’s all very conspiracy theorist of me, but I cannot see any other reason why the National Party are showing such interest in a shaky party like ACT.
More proof that Logan represents ONLY Labour voting students. Is he willing to admit that he doesn’t represent the majority of students that voted in National at the last election? Despite the Labour election bribes, more students rejected Labour in 2008. Why then should students pay for Logan, OUSA and NZUSA to campaign against them?
The argument for VSM is that students should get a choice, whether this is the true motivation for the Politian’s is questionable. I agree the current membership system is not perfect, but the solution should be what the students want and should be based on students input. It is not a decision to be made by those who it does not affect, such as politicians. The government needs to work with student’s associations to find an agreeable solution, an enduring policy which recognises the key stakeholders, the students, like you.
Not once has Logan talked about freedom of association. Interesting isn’t it? He has ignored the calls from students to allow them the freedom to not join a union. He has rejected over half of his membership’s opinions to push his own agenda – which coincidentally is the same agenda of the Labour Party.
What does this ordinary student got to fear? Ordinary students don’t give a toss about OUSA and throughout the decades OUSA has failed to engage themselves with the masses. They chose to pursue far left policies and then later snuggled up to Labour and the Greens. They sat back and never fought the University when iconic student bars were closed down by the Universities. They say back for 9 years when Labour was in Government and ignored calls to tighten their budgets, instead raising levies higher and higher and ignoring the growing nationwide momentum supporting VSM.
Logan has the chance to be a great president. He needs to can the bullshit and look at the bigger picture. Why don’t students vote? Why do they never attend student meetings? If he could sell OUSA as being meaningful to students rather than the common perception that its captured by hippies and left wing career student politicians then he will be successful. At the moment he is part of the problem and the sad thing is he will blame VSM when OUSA falls over – not realising that he had its future right in his hands and lost the opportunity.
Labels: NZUSA, OUSA, student assocations, VSM